Puzzle Healthcare
Post-Acute Network Analysis

UPMC Health

An eight-quarter review of FFS SNF discharge patterns, destination concentration, and the opportunity for systematic post-acute visibility across a 28-hospital, multi-state network spanning Pennsylvania, New York, and Maryland.

Prepared by: Puzzle Healthcare
Date: June 12, 2026
Data Period: Q4 2024 – Q3 2025
System: UPMC Health (University of Pittsburgh Medical Center)
Confidential 25 active hospitals  ·  5,922 FFS SNF patients  ·  375 SNF destinations  ·  PA / NY / MD
25
UPMC Hospitals
(Active Data)
5,922
FFS SNF
Patients
375
Unique SNF
Destinations
129
Cross-System
SNFs (2+ Hosps)
15
Priority SNF
Targets
8
Quarters
Analyzed

Scale, Fragmentation, and the Opportunity to Coordinate a System-Wide Post-Acute Network

UPMC Health operates one of the largest integrated health systems in the country, with hospitals spanning Pennsylvania, New York, and Maryland. Its post-acute discharge picture is one of extraordinary scale — tens of thousands of Medicare patients flowing annually to hundreds of SNF destinations — with limited cross-hospital coordination and no unified preferred-network infrastructure to manage that volume systematically.

Over eight quarters (Q4 2024 – Q3 2025), UPMC hospitals collectively discharged 5,922 fee-for-service Medicare patients to skilled nursing facilities, reaching 375 distinct SNF destinations across Pennsylvania, New York, and Maryland. UPMC Western Maryland leads the system in post-acute volume with 720 patients across 25 SNF destinations — the single largest UPMC post-acute relationship set in the analysis. UPMC Pinnacle (Harrisburg), UPMC Hamot, and UPMC Presbyterian Shadyside collectively account for a substantial share of the system's total SNF volume.

Pennsylvania state SNF utilization benchmarks are not available in the current data extract; comparison uses national CMS averages where applicable. What the data does reveal clearly is a destination fragmentation and coordination story at scale: across 25 active hospitals, 5,922 patients are distributed to 375 SNFs, most of which operate without any structured performance framework, preferred-network accountability, or real-time clinical visibility from UPMC.

Within UPMC's existing discharge patterns is a structural starting point for coordination: 129 SNFs already serve two or more UPMC hospitals simultaneously. These shared facilities are the organic preferred network — facilities that UPMC hospitals have collectively chosen through discharge patterns without any formal coordination. Puzzle Healthcare's role is to formalize that organic network, extend its reach, and make performance systematically measurable and accountable.

The 15 priority SNF targets identified in this analysis — facilities with elevated FSHR rates appearing across multiple UPMC hospitals — represent the highest-impact starting cohort for an embedded clinical program. Together they account for significant patient volume and carry FSHR rates meaningfully above the system-wide average of 31.4%.

01
System-wide FSHR of 31.4%: high fragmentation, limited coordination
Across 25 hospitals, UPMC's weighted FSHR stands at 31.4% — indicating that more than one-in-three SNF patients are returning to the hospital. Without a coordinated preferred network, these discharges occur to hundreds of independently operated facilities with no shared performance standards and no embedded clinical oversight from UPMC care teams.
02
15 priority SNF targets with elevated FSHR appearing across multiple UPMC hospitals
The priority target analysis surfaces 15 SNFs with FSHR rates significantly above the system average and appearing in two or more hospital discharge networks. These facilities represent the highest-risk, highest-leverage intervention points across the UPMC system — natural candidates for an embedded clinical presence and preferred-network performance standards.
03
129 SNFs already serve multiple UPMC hospitals — a natural preferred-network foundation
Of the 375 SNF destinations across the UPMC network, 129 are shared across two or more UPMC hospitals. These shared facilities represent existing trust relationships that can be formalized into a coordinated preferred network without requiring new partnerships to be built from scratch. The 20 SNFs serving three or more UPMC hospitals are the natural anchor points for initial engagement.

28 Hospitals, One Shared Post-Acute Challenge

UPMC Health operates 28 acute-care hospitals across Pennsylvania, New York, and Maryland — from flagship academic medical centers in Pittsburgh to community hospitals in rural Appalachian communities. Each hospital draws from a distinct patient population and sends patients to a partially overlapping, partially distinct set of SNF partners across three states.

UPMC Western Maryland
Cumberland, MD  ·  213 Beds  ·  Cumberland / Allegany County, MD
FFS SNF Patients720
SNF Destinations25
FSHR13.3%
Community hospital in Cumberland, MD; only UPMC facility in Maryland.
UPMC Pinnacle (Harrisburg / Community Osteopathic / West Shore)
Harrisburg, PA  ·  704 Beds  ·  Harrisburg / Dauphin–Cumberland Corridor, PA
FFS SNF Patients587
SNF Destinations30
FSHR36.2%
Covers: UPMC Harrisburg, UPMC Community Osteopathic, UPMC West Shore. Tertiary flagship for Central PA; covers Harrisburg, Community Osteopathic, and West Shore campuses.
UPMC Hamot
Erie, PA  ·  412 Beds  ·  Erie / Lake Erie Region, PA
FFS SNF Patients462
SNF Destinations30
FSHR36.1%
Erie region tertiary center; Level II Trauma; dominant post-acute volume in Northwestern PA.
UPMC Presbyterian Shadyside (incl. Montefiore)
Pittsburgh, PA  ·  1420 Beds  ·  Pittsburgh Metro / Allegheny County, PA
FFS SNF Patients431
SNF Destinations21
FSHR32.9%
System flagship; 1,420-bed Pittsburgh academic medical center including Montefiore campus.
UPMC Passavant – McCandless
McCandless, PA  ·  394 Beds  ·  North Pittsburgh / McCandless Township, PA
FFS SNF Patients357
SNF Destinations25
FSHR33.1%
North Pittsburgh community hospital; high SNF concentration in McCandless corridor.
UPMC Jameson
New Castle, PA  ·  133 Beds  ·  New Castle / Lawrence County, PA
FFS SNF Patients302
SNF Destinations30
FSHR54.3%
Community hospital in New Castle, Lawrence County.
UPMC Carlisle
Carlisle, PA  ·  165 Beds  ·  Carlisle / Cumberland County, PA
FFS SNF Patients302
SNF Destinations30
FSHR32.3%
Community hospital in Carlisle; shares Central PA SNF market with Pinnacle.
UPMC Northwest
Seneca, PA  ·  171 Beds  ·  Seneca / Clarion–Venango County, PA
FFS SNF Patients292
SNF Destinations30
FSHR38.0%
Community hospital serving Clarion and Venango counties.
UPMC Washington
Washington, PA  ·  244 Beds  ·  Washington / Washington County, PA
FFS SNF Patients292
SNF Destinations30
FSHR33.3%
Community hospital in Washington, PA; Southwest Pittsburgh corridor.
UPMC Hanover
Hanover, PA  ·  93 Beds  ·  Hanover / York County, PA
FFS SNF Patients285
SNF Destinations30
FSHR33.0%
Community hospital in Hanover, York County.
UPMC Altoona
Altoona, PA  ·  380 Beds  ·  Altoona / Blair County, PA
FFS SNF Patients283
SNF Destinations30
FSHR42.6%
Regional medical center for Blair County / Allegheny Mountain corridor.
UPMC Williamsport
Williamsport, PA  ·  224 Beds  ·  Williamsport / Lycoming County, PA
FFS SNF Patients253
SNF Destinations25
FSHR33.0%
Regional center for Northcentral PA; covers Lycoming County market.
UPMC Horizon (Greenville / Shenango Valley)
Greenville, PA  ·  228 Beds  ·  Greenville–Sharon / Mercer County, PA
FFS SNF Patients203
SNF Destinations30
FSHR26.5%
Covers: UPMC Horizon – Greenville, UPMC Horizon – Shenango Valley. Covers Greenville and Shenango Valley campuses in Mercer County.
UPMC Chautauqua
Jamestown, NY  ·  199 Beds  ·  Jamestown / Chautauqua County, NY
FFS SNF Patients201
SNF Destinations25
FSHR27.4%
Only UPMC facility in New York; serves Jamestown / Chautauqua County.
UPMC East
Monroeville, PA  ·  156 Beds  ·  Monroeville / Eastern Allegheny County, PA
FFS SNF Patients163
SNF Destinations25
FSHR35.1%
Community hospital in Monroeville; Eastern Allegheny County.
UPMC St. Margaret
Pittsburgh, PA  ·  250 Beds  ·  Pittsburgh North Shore / Allegheny County, PA
FFS SNF Patients158
SNF Destinations25
FSHR27.5%
Community hospital on Pittsburgh North Shore; high preferred-SNF overlap with Presbyterian Shadyside.
UPMC Memorial
York, PA  ·  98 Beds  ·  York / York County, PA
FFS SNF Patients152
SNF Destinations30
FSHR27.5%
Community hospital in York; shares York County SNF market with Hanover.
UPMC Mercy
Pittsburgh, PA  ·  404 Beds  ·  Pittsburgh Downtown / Allegheny County, PA
FFS SNF Patients121
SNF Destinations25
FSHR30.9%
Inner-city Pittsburgh tertiary center; Catholic heritage campus.
UPMC Lititz
Lititz, PA  ·  55 Beds  ·  Lititz / Lancaster County, PA
FFS SNF Patients111
SNF Destinations30
FSHR25.2%
Small community hospital in Lancaster County.
UPMC Wellsboro
Wellsboro, PA  ·  25 Beds  ·  Wellsboro / Tioga County, PA
FFS SNF Patients72
SNF Destinations10
FSHR44.0%
Critical access-scale hospital in Tioga County; limited SNF data.
UPMC Somerset
Somerset, PA  ·  99 Beds  ·  Somerset / Somerset County, PA
FFS SNF Patients51
SNF Destinations21
FSHR30.5%
Community hospital in Somerset County; limited SNF data period.
UPMC Bedford
Everett, PA  ·  40 Beds  ·  Bedford / Bedford County, PA
FFS SNF Patients44
SNF Destinations11
FSHR29.6%
Small community hospital in Bedford County; limited SNF data.
UPMC Magee-Womens Hospital
Pittsburgh, PA  ·  335 Beds  ·  Pittsburgh / Allegheny County, PA (Women's / OB)
FFS SNF Patients30
SNF Destinations25
FSHR30.3%
Women's and OB specialty hospital; limited SNF discharge population.
UPMC McKeesport
McKeesport, PA  ·  213 Beds  ·  McKeesport / Allegheny County, PA
FFS SNF Patients28
SNF Destinations25
FSHR31.9%
Community hospital in McKeesport; Southeast Allegheny County.
UPMC Kane
Kane, PA  ·  31 Beds  ·  Kane / McKean County, PA
FFS SNF Patients22
SNF Destinations11
FSHR66.7%
Critical-access scale hospital in McKean County; small SNF volume.
UPMC Passavant – Cranberry
Cranberry Township, PA  ·  35 Beds  ·  Cranberry Township / Butler County, PA
FFS SNF PatientsNo data
SNF Destinations
FSHR
Cranberry Township campus (35 beds); no separate CMS Medicare FFS Claims record — data not tracked separately from McCandless.
UPMC Greene
Waynesburg, PA  ·  23 Beds  ·  Waynesburg / Greene County, PA
FFS SNF PatientsNo data
SNF Destinations
FSHR
Community hospital in Waynesburg, Greene County; CMS does not publish FSHR data for this facility.
UPMC Muncy
Muncy, PA  ·  158 Beds  ·  Muncy / Lycoming County, PA
FFS SNF PatientsNo data
SNF Destinations
FSHR
Community hospital in Muncy, Lycoming County; CMS does not publish FSHR data for this facility.
* Data Availability Note: Three UPMC facilities (Passavant–Cranberry, Greene, Muncy) have no separate CMS Medicare FFS Claims record or insufficient data for the analysis period and are excluded from SNF performance metrics. All system totals reflect the 25 hospitals with active data. All reported system totals (5,922 FFS patients, 375 SNF destinations) reflect only the 25 hospitals with active CMS Medicare FFS Claims data.

UPMC's geographic span across Pennsylvania, New York, and Maryland represents both a strategic complexity and a significant opportunity. Unlike single-state health systems managing one regulatory environment, UPMC's post-acute network must navigate distinct SNF markets across three states — each with its own certificate-of-need landscape, Medicaid environment, and community of SNF operators. This complexity is precisely where a coordinated preferred-network framework delivers the greatest operational value: a unified performance standard, embedded clinical presence, and real-time visibility layer that operates consistently across all 25 hospitals regardless of geography.


A Long Tail: Top 5 SNFs Capture 45%, Many More Share the Rest

UPMC Western Maryland’s 25-facility SNF destination network illustrates a pattern common to high-volume academic medical centers: a small number of facilities receive outsized volume, while the majority consist of lower-volume relationships that are difficult to manage systematically. This is the visibility challenge at the heart of UPMC’s post-acute situation — replicated across 25 hospitals and 375 SNF destinations.

UPMC Western Maryland — Top SNF Partners by Volume (FSHR shown)
SNF Name
FSHR
Volume / Share
Frostburg Snf Operator Llc
138 pts  ·  8.7% share
Allegany Health Nursing And Rehabilitation
127 pts  ·  8.7% share
Devlin Manor Nursing And Rehabilitation Center
90 pts  ·  8.9% share
Peace Healthcare At Lions Center
89 pts  ·  9.2% share
Cumberland Healthcare Center
87 pts  ·  9.5% share
Mc Healthcare Operations Llc
70 pts  ·  10.1% share
Moran Nursing And Rehabilitation Center
35 pts  ·  9.0% share
Complete Care At Dawnview Llc
31 pts  ·  9.3% share
Top 5 SNFs = 45% of Western Maryland's FFS SNF volume. Remaining 55% distributed across additional facilities.

The concentration pattern at UPMC Western Maryland is characteristic of a large academic medical center. Its top SNF partners already have the volume to support an embedded clinical presence — and they clearly have established relationships with Western Maryland’s discharge planning teams. The coordination gap lives in the long tail: the facilities receiving smaller patient volumes with no systematic performance framework or preferred-network accountability.

Multiplied across 25 UPMC hospitals and 375 total SNF destinations system-wide, that long tail represents hundreds of downstream facilities operating beyond the horizon of UPMC’s visibility. That is precisely the structural problem a unified preferred-network framework addresses — starting with the 129 cross-system facilities that already appear in multiple UPMC discharge networks simultaneously.


Reading the FSHR Signals: Performance Across 25 Hospitals

Pennsylvania state SNF utilization and readmission benchmarks are not available in the current data extract — Pennsylvania state benchmark not available; comparison uses national CMS average where applicable. The system-wide FSHR of 31.4% serves as the primary internal reference point for identifying hospitals with elevated return-to-hospital rates and high-impact intervention opportunities.

UPMC Western Maryland
Cumberland, MD  ·  213 Beds  ·  Opportunity Score: 53
Near-Term Priority
720
FFS SNF Patients
25
SNF Destinations
13.3%
FSHR (-18.2pp vs system)
31.4%
System FSHR Avg

UPMC Western Maryland discharged 720 FFS patients to 25 distinct SNF destinations over the analysis period. FSHR stands at 13.3%, -18.2pp vs system average. The leading post-acute destination is Frostburg Snf Operator Llc (138 patients, 8.7% share).

The Western Maryland post-acute network illustrates the broader UPMC pattern: a small number of high-volume SNF relationships account for the top discharge share, while the remaining volume is distributed across a long tail of facilities that operate without systematic performance oversight. A preferred-network framework anchored at Western Maryland’s highest-volume destinations — with embedded clinical presence at the most critical facilities — would immediately extend coordinated care management across the majority of this hospital’s post-acute volume.

Top SNF Partners Pts Share FSHR Risk
Frostburg Snf Operator Llc1388.7%19.7%Moderate
Allegany Health Nursing And Rehabilitation1278.7%18.2%Moderate
Devlin Manor Nursing And Rehabilitation Center908.9%12.9%Moderate
Peace Healthcare At Lions Center899.2%12.7%Moderate
Cumberland Healthcare Center879.5%12.4%Moderate
UPMC Pinnacle (Harrisburg / Community Osteopathic / West Shore)
Harrisburg, PA  ·  704 Beds  ·  Opportunity Score: 38
Near-Term Priority
587
FFS SNF Patients
30
SNF Destinations
36.2%
FSHR (+4.8pp vs system)
31.4%
System FSHR Avg

UPMC Pinnacle (Harrisburg / Community Osteopathic / West Shore) discharged 587 FFS patients to 30 distinct SNF destinations over the analysis period. FSHR stands at 36.2%, +4.8pp vs system average. The leading post-acute destination is Spring Creek Rehabilitation And Nursing Center (117 patients, 17.0% share). The hospital’s SNF network includes 10 facilityies with a “Very High” risk category.

The Pinnacle Harrisburg post-acute network illustrates the broader UPMC pattern: a small number of high-volume SNF relationships account for the top discharge share, while the remaining volume is distributed across a long tail of facilities that operate without systematic performance oversight. A preferred-network framework anchored at Pinnacle Harrisburg’s highest-volume destinations — with embedded clinical presence at the most critical facilities — would immediately extend coordinated care management across the majority of this hospital’s post-acute volume.

Top SNF Partners Pts Share FSHR Risk
Spring Creek Rehabilitation And Nursing Center11717.0%48.5%High
Capitol Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center10915.8%34.2%High
Messiah Lifeways At Messiah Village466.7%18.4%High
Vibra Rehabilitation Center426.1%41.2%High
Camp Hill Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation Center385.5%31.9%High
UPMC Hamot
Erie, PA  ·  412 Beds  ·  Opportunity Score: 32
Monitor
462
FFS SNF Patients
30
SNF Destinations
36.1%
FSHR (+4.7pp vs system)
31.4%
System FSHR Avg

UPMC Hamot discharged 462 FFS patients to 30 distinct SNF destinations over the analysis period. FSHR stands at 36.1%, +4.7pp vs system average. The leading post-acute destination is Presbyterian Homes In The Presbytery Of Lake Erie (50 patients, 8.5% share). The hospital’s SNF network includes 9 facilityies with a “Very High” risk category.

The Hamot post-acute network illustrates the broader UPMC pattern: a small number of high-volume SNF relationships account for the top discharge share, while the remaining volume is distributed across a long tail of facilities that operate without systematic performance oversight. A preferred-network framework anchored at Hamot’s highest-volume destinations — with embedded clinical presence at the most critical facilities — would immediately extend coordinated care management across the majority of this hospital’s post-acute volume.

Top SNF Partners Pts Share FSHR Risk
Presbyterian Homes In The Presbytery Of Lake Erie508.5%22.3%Elevated
Erie Snf Operations Llc498.3%47.4%High
Millcreek Manor376.3%32.1%High
Heritage Park Rehab & Skilled Nursing305.1%51.0%High
Dba Saint Mary'S At Asbury Ridge244.1%28.1%Elevated
UPMC Presbyterian Shadyside (incl. Montefiore)
Pittsburgh, PA  ·  1420 Beds  ·  Opportunity Score: 29
Monitor
431
FFS SNF Patients
21
SNF Destinations
32.9%
FSHR (+1.4pp vs system)
31.4%
System FSHR Avg

UPMC Presbyterian Shadyside (incl. Montefiore) discharged 431 FFS patients to 21 distinct SNF destinations over the analysis period. FSHR stands at 32.9%, +1.4pp vs system average. The leading post-acute destination is East End Health & Rehab Center, Llc (42 patients, 4.3% share). The hospital’s SNF network includes 7 facilityies with a “Very High” risk category.

The Presbyterian Shadyside post-acute network illustrates the broader UPMC pattern: a small number of high-volume SNF relationships account for the top discharge share, while the remaining volume is distributed across a long tail of facilities that operate without systematic performance oversight. A preferred-network framework anchored at Presbyterian Shadyside’s highest-volume destinations — with embedded clinical presence at the most critical facilities — would immediately extend coordinated care management across the majority of this hospital’s post-acute volume.

Top SNF Partners Pts Share FSHR Risk
East End Health & Rehab Center, Llc424.3%25.6%Elevated
Penn-Allegheny Nursing And Rehabilitation Center Llc373.8%35.6%High
Canterbury Place343.5%35.6%High
Upmc Magee-Womens Hospital293.0%43.1%Elevated
Harmony Physical Rehabilitation272.8%19.6%High
UPMC Passavant – McCandless
McCandless, PA  ·  394 Beds  ·  Opportunity Score: 34
Monitor
357
FFS SNF Patients
25
SNF Destinations
33.1%
FSHR (+1.7pp vs system)
31.4%
System FSHR Avg

UPMC Passavant – McCandless discharged 357 FFS patients to 25 distinct SNF destinations over the analysis period. FSHR stands at 33.1%, +1.7pp vs system average. The leading post-acute destination is Vincentian Home (105 patients, 22.0% share). The hospital’s SNF network includes 12 facilityies with a “Very High” risk category.

The Passavant–McCandless post-acute network illustrates the broader UPMC pattern: a small number of high-volume SNF relationships account for the top discharge share, while the remaining volume is distributed across a long tail of facilities that operate without systematic performance oversight. A preferred-network framework anchored at Passavant–McCandless’s highest-volume destinations — with embedded clinical presence at the most critical facilities — would immediately extend coordinated care management across the majority of this hospital’s post-acute volume.

Top SNF Partners Pts Share FSHR Risk
Vincentian Home10522.0%30.2%Elevated
Concordia At Rebecca Residence5110.7%36.3%High
Cranberry Place336.9%39.5%High
St. Barnabas Nursing Home, Inc.336.9%25.0%Elevated
North Hills Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation Center285.9%60.0%High
UPMC Jameson
New Castle, PA  ·  133 Beds  ·  Opportunity Score: 36
Near-Term Priority
302
FFS SNF Patients
30
SNF Destinations
54.3%
FSHR (+22.9pp vs system)
31.4%
System FSHR Avg

UPMC Jameson discharged 302 FFS patients to 30 distinct SNF destinations over the analysis period. FSHR stands at 54.3%, +22.9pp vs system average. The leading post-acute destination is Avalon Place (71 patients, 16.2% share). The hospital’s SNF network includes 9 facilityies with a “Very High” risk category.

The Jameson post-acute network illustrates the broader UPMC pattern: a small number of high-volume SNF relationships account for the top discharge share, while the remaining volume is distributed across a long tail of facilities that operate without systematic performance oversight. A preferred-network framework anchored at Jameson’s highest-volume destinations — with embedded clinical presence at the most critical facilities — would immediately extend coordinated care management across the majority of this hospital’s post-acute volume.

Top SNF Partners Pts Share FSHR Risk
Avalon Place7116.2%Moderate
Jameson Care Center, Inc.6514.8%Moderate
Jamc Opco Llc4218.2%50.7%High
Ava Opco Llc2310.0%52.8%High
Golden Hill Nursing And Rehab Lp2310.0%61.0%High
UPMC Carlisle
Carlisle, PA  ·  165 Beds  ·  Opportunity Score: 32
Monitor
302
FFS SNF Patients
30
SNF Destinations
32.3%
FSHR (+0.8pp vs system)
31.4%
System FSHR Avg

UPMC Carlisle discharged 302 FFS patients to 30 distinct SNF destinations over the analysis period. FSHR stands at 32.3%, +0.8pp vs system average. The leading post-acute destination is Cumberland Crossings (49 patients, 15.8% share). The hospital’s SNF network includes 12 facilityies with a “Very High” risk category.

The Carlisle post-acute network illustrates the broader UPMC pattern: a small number of high-volume SNF relationships account for the top discharge share, while the remaining volume is distributed across a long tail of facilities that operate without systematic performance oversight. A preferred-network framework anchored at Carlisle’s highest-volume destinations — with embedded clinical presence at the most critical facilities — would immediately extend coordinated care management across the majority of this hospital’s post-acute volume.

Top SNF Partners Pts Share FSHR Risk
Cumberland Crossings4915.8%25.5%Elevated
Carlisle Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation Center4815.4%40.2%High
Claremont Nursing & Rehabilitation Center Llc4414.1%31.8%High
Fp 700 Operations Llc3611.6%43.0%High
Swaim Health Center3410.9%36.6%High
UPMC Northwest
Seneca, PA  ·  171 Beds  ·  Opportunity Score: 34
Monitor
292
FFS SNF Patients
30
SNF Destinations
38.0%
FSHR (+6.5pp vs system)
31.4%
System FSHR Avg

UPMC Northwest discharged 292 FFS patients to 30 distinct SNF destinations over the analysis period. FSHR stands at 38.0%, +6.5pp vs system average. The leading post-acute destination is Upmc Northwest (83 patients, 35.0% share). The hospital’s SNF network includes 12 facilityies with a “Very High” risk category.

The Northwest post-acute network illustrates the broader UPMC pattern: a small number of high-volume SNF relationships account for the top discharge share, while the remaining volume is distributed across a long tail of facilities that operate without systematic performance oversight. A preferred-network framework anchored at Northwest’s highest-volume destinations — with embedded clinical presence at the most critical facilities — would immediately extend coordinated care management across the majority of this hospital’s post-acute volume.

Top SNF Partners Pts Share FSHR Risk
Upmc Northwest8335.0%36.9%High
The Caring Place4820.3%30.4%High
Sugarcreek Station3813.5%Moderate
Scs Opco Llc3715.6%40.4%Elevated
Oakwood Heights Village3313.9%47.1%High
UPMC Washington
Washington, PA  ·  244 Beds  ·  Opportunity Score: 31
Monitor
292
FFS SNF Patients
30
SNF Destinations
33.3%
FSHR (+1.9pp vs system)
31.4%
System FSHR Avg

UPMC Washington discharged 292 FFS patients to 30 distinct SNF destinations over the analysis period. FSHR stands at 33.3%, +1.9pp vs system average. The leading post-acute destination is Southmont Of Presbyterian Senior Care (114 patients, 34.3% share). The hospital’s SNF network includes 6 facilityies with a “Very High” risk category.

The Washington post-acute network illustrates the broader UPMC pattern: a small number of high-volume SNF relationships account for the top discharge share, while the remaining volume is distributed across a long tail of facilities that operate without systematic performance oversight. A preferred-network framework anchored at Washington’s highest-volume destinations — with embedded clinical presence at the most critical facilities — would immediately extend coordinated care management across the majority of this hospital’s post-acute volume.

Top SNF Partners Pts Share FSHR Risk
Southmont Of Presbyterian Senior Care11434.3%27.4%High
Transitions Healthcare Washington Pa3610.8%34.6%High
Washington Operating Llc3610.8%50.6%High
Rolling Meadows Operating Llc3410.2%33.3%Elevated
Greenery Center For Rehab And Nursing206.0%16.7%High
UPMC Hanover
Hanover, PA  ·  93 Beds  ·  Opportunity Score: 30
Monitor
285
FFS SNF Patients
30
SNF Destinations
33.0%
FSHR (+1.5pp vs system)
31.4%
System FSHR Avg

UPMC Hanover discharged 285 FFS patients to 30 distinct SNF destinations over the analysis period. FSHR stands at 33.0%, +1.5pp vs system average. The leading post-acute destination is Homewood At Hanover, Pa Inc (77 patients, 25.4% share). The hospital’s SNF network includes 6 facilityies with a “Very High” risk category.

The Hanover post-acute network illustrates the broader UPMC pattern: a small number of high-volume SNF relationships account for the top discharge share, while the remaining volume is distributed across a long tail of facilities that operate without systematic performance oversight. A preferred-network framework anchored at Hanover’s highest-volume destinations — with embedded clinical presence at the most critical facilities — would immediately extend coordinated care management across the majority of this hospital’s post-acute volume.

Top SNF Partners Pts Share FSHR Risk
Homewood At Hanover, Pa Inc7725.4%31.5%Elevated
Hanover Hall For Nursing And Rehabilitation5217.2%52.1%High
Cross Keys Village - The Brethren Home Community3511.6%24.1%Elevated
Gettysburg Center3210.6%33.8%High
Spiritrust Lutheran The Village At Utz Terrace3110.2%18.0%High
UPMC Altoona
Altoona, PA  ·  380 Beds  ·  Opportunity Score: 33
Monitor
283
FFS SNF Patients
30
SNF Destinations
42.6%
FSHR (+11.2pp vs system)
31.4%
System FSHR Avg

UPMC Altoona discharged 283 FFS patients to 30 distinct SNF destinations over the analysis period. FSHR stands at 42.6%, +11.2pp vs system average. The leading post-acute destination is Valley View Health And Rehabilitation Center (57 patients, 16.3% share). The hospital’s SNF network includes 10 facilityies with a “Very High” risk category.

The Altoona post-acute network illustrates the broader UPMC pattern: a small number of high-volume SNF relationships account for the top discharge share, while the remaining volume is distributed across a long tail of facilities that operate without systematic performance oversight. A preferred-network framework anchored at Altoona’s highest-volume destinations — with embedded clinical presence at the most critical facilities — would immediately extend coordinated care management across the majority of this hospital’s post-acute volume.

Top SNF Partners Pts Share FSHR Risk
Valley View Health And Rehabilitation Center5716.3%43.8%High
Homewood Living Martinsburg, Inc.4813.7%24.0%High
Presbyterian Home Of Hollidaysburg4512.9%52.9%High
Epworth Rehabilitation And Healthcare Llc298.3%41.4%Elevated
Midtown Oaks Health & Rehab Center, Llc298.3%68.2%High
UPMC Williamsport
Williamsport, PA  ·  224 Beds  ·  Opportunity Score: 23
Monitor
253
FFS SNF Patients
25
SNF Destinations
33.0%
FSHR (+1.5pp vs system)
31.4%
System FSHR Avg

UPMC Williamsport discharged 253 FFS patients to 25 distinct SNF destinations over the analysis period. FSHR stands at 33.0%, +1.5pp vs system average. The leading post-acute destination is Williamsport Home (66 patients, 23.0% share).

The Williamsport post-acute network illustrates the broader UPMC pattern: a small number of high-volume SNF relationships account for the top discharge share, while the remaining volume is distributed across a long tail of facilities that operate without systematic performance oversight. A preferred-network framework anchored at Williamsport’s highest-volume destinations — with embedded clinical presence at the most critical facilities — would immediately extend coordinated care management across the majority of this hospital’s post-acute volume.

Top SNF Partners Pts Share FSHR Risk
Williamsport Home6623.0%25.8%Moderate
Rose View Nursing And Rehabilitation Center4013.9%45.5%Moderate
Valley View Nursing Center3612.5%41.4%Moderate
Sv Opco Llc289.8%29.8%Moderate
Loyalsock Operating Llc248.4%22.8%Moderate
UPMC Horizon (Greenville / Shenango Valley)
Greenville, PA  ·  228 Beds  ·  Opportunity Score: 28
Monitor
203
FFS SNF Patients
30
SNF Destinations
26.5%
FSHR (-5.0pp vs system)
31.4%
System FSHR Avg

UPMC Horizon (Greenville / Shenango Valley) discharged 203 FFS patients to 30 distinct SNF destinations over the analysis period. FSHR stands at 26.5%, -5.0pp vs system average. The leading post-acute destination is St. Paul Homes (46 patients, 20.2% share). The hospital’s SNF network includes 8 facilityies with a “Very High” risk category.

The Horizon post-acute network illustrates the broader UPMC pattern: a small number of high-volume SNF relationships account for the top discharge share, while the remaining volume is distributed across a long tail of facilities that operate without systematic performance oversight. A preferred-network framework anchored at Horizon’s highest-volume destinations — with embedded clinical presence at the most critical facilities — would immediately extend coordinated care management across the majority of this hospital’s post-acute volume.

Top SNF Partners Pts Share FSHR Risk
St. Paul Homes4620.2%19.6%Elevated
Hermitage Nursing And Rehabilitation2912.7%35.2%High
Jamc Opco Llc2310.1%High
John Xxiii Home219.2%27.5%High
The Grove At Greenville208.8%20.0%High
UPMC Chautauqua
Jamestown, NY  ·  199 Beds  ·  Opportunity Score: 46
Near-Term Priority
201
FFS SNF Patients
25
SNF Destinations
27.4%
FSHR (-4.0pp vs system)
31.4%
System FSHR Avg

UPMC Chautauqua discharged 201 FFS patients to 25 distinct SNF destinations over the analysis period. FSHR stands at 27.4%, -4.0pp vs system average. The leading post-acute destination is Heritage Park Rehab & Skilled Nursing (77 patients, 7.2% share).

The Chautauqua post-acute network illustrates the broader UPMC pattern: a small number of high-volume SNF relationships account for the top discharge share, while the remaining volume is distributed across a long tail of facilities that operate without systematic performance oversight. A preferred-network framework anchored at Chautauqua’s highest-volume destinations — with embedded clinical presence at the most critical facilities — would immediately extend coordinated care management across the majority of this hospital’s post-acute volume.

Top SNF Partners Pts Share FSHR Risk
Heritage Park Rehab & Skilled Nursing777.2%34.5%Moderate
Heritage Green Rehab & Skilled Nursing747.0%33.2%Moderate
Warren Manor227.3%9.9%Moderate
Sarnc Operating Llc167.2%7.2%Moderate
Chautauqua Nursing & Rehabilitation Center127.6%5.4%Moderate
UPMC East
Monroeville, PA  ·  156 Beds  ·  Opportunity Score: 27
Monitor
163
FFS SNF Patients
25
SNF Destinations
35.1%
FSHR (+3.6pp vs system)
31.4%
System FSHR Avg

UPMC East discharged 163 FFS patients to 25 distinct SNF destinations over the analysis period. FSHR stands at 35.1%, +3.6pp vs system average. The leading post-acute destination is Harmony Physical Rehabilitation (43 patients, 16.2% share). The hospital’s SNF network includes 8 facilityies with a “Very High” risk category.

The East post-acute network illustrates the broader UPMC pattern: a small number of high-volume SNF relationships account for the top discharge share, while the remaining volume is distributed across a long tail of facilities that operate without systematic performance oversight. A preferred-network framework anchored at East’s highest-volume destinations — with embedded clinical presence at the most critical facilities — would immediately extend coordinated care management across the majority of this hospital’s post-acute volume.

Top SNF Partners Pts Share FSHR Risk
Harmony Physical Rehabilitation4316.2%22.7%High
Concordia At The Cedars3111.7%34.9%High
Woodhaven Health & Rehab Center, Llc176.4%59.0%Elevated
The Rehabilitation & Nursing Center At Greater Pittsburgh166.0%52.5%High
Redstone Presbyterian Senior Care155.7%29.0%Elevated
UPMC St. Margaret
Pittsburgh, PA  ·  250 Beds  ·  Opportunity Score: 29
Monitor
158
FFS SNF Patients
25
SNF Destinations
27.5%
FSHR (-4.0pp vs system)
31.4%
System FSHR Avg

UPMC St. Margaret discharged 158 FFS patients to 25 distinct SNF destinations over the analysis period. FSHR stands at 27.5%, -4.0pp vs system average. The leading post-acute destination is The Willows Of Presbyterian Medical Center (52 patients, 22.3% share). The hospital’s SNF network includes 9 facilityies with a “Very High” risk category.

The St. Margaret post-acute network illustrates the broader UPMC pattern: a small number of high-volume SNF relationships account for the top discharge share, while the remaining volume is distributed across a long tail of facilities that operate without systematic performance oversight. A preferred-network framework anchored at St. Margaret’s highest-volume destinations — with embedded clinical presence at the most critical facilities — would immediately extend coordinated care management across the majority of this hospital’s post-acute volume.

Top SNF Partners Pts Share FSHR Risk
The Willows Of Presbyterian Medical Center5222.3%25.0%High
Concordia At Rebecca Residence2912.4%29.1%Elevated
Longwood At Oakmont, Inc219.0%10.4%High
Seneca Place219.0%High
Concordia Lutheran Health And Human Care198.2%41.7%High
UPMC Memorial
York, PA  ·  98 Beds  ·  Opportunity Score: 27
Monitor
152
FFS SNF Patients
30
SNF Destinations
27.5%
FSHR (-3.9pp vs system)
31.4%
System FSHR Avg

UPMC Memorial discharged 152 FFS patients to 30 distinct SNF destinations over the analysis period. FSHR stands at 27.5%, -3.9pp vs system average. The leading post-acute destination is Normandie Ridge (42 patients, 20.1% share). The hospital’s SNF network includes 5 facilityies with a “Very High” risk category.

The Memorial post-acute network illustrates the broader UPMC pattern: a small number of high-volume SNF relationships account for the top discharge share, while the remaining volume is distributed across a long tail of facilities that operate without systematic performance oversight. A preferred-network framework anchored at Memorial’s highest-volume destinations — with embedded clinical presence at the most critical facilities — would immediately extend coordinated care management across the majority of this hospital’s post-acute volume.

Top SNF Partners Pts Share FSHR Risk
Normandie Ridge4220.1%31.2%High
York North Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation Center3516.7%31.2%Elevated
York South Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation Center2411.5%22.2%Elevated
Dallastown Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation Center2311.0%25.0%Elevated
Kingston Court Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation Center167.7%21.6%High
UPMC Mercy
Pittsburgh, PA  ·  404 Beds  ·  Opportunity Score: 22
Monitor
121
FFS SNF Patients
25
SNF Destinations
30.9%
FSHR (-0.5pp vs system)
31.4%
System FSHR Avg

UPMC Mercy discharged 121 FFS patients to 25 distinct SNF destinations over the analysis period. FSHR stands at 30.9%, -0.5pp vs system average. The leading post-acute destination is Asbury Health Center (20 patients, 4.2% share). The hospital’s SNF network includes 3 facilityies with a “Very High” risk category.

The Mercy post-acute network illustrates the broader UPMC pattern: a small number of high-volume SNF relationships account for the top discharge share, while the remaining volume is distributed across a long tail of facilities that operate without systematic performance oversight. A preferred-network framework anchored at Mercy’s highest-volume destinations — with embedded clinical presence at the most critical facilities — would immediately extend coordinated care management across the majority of this hospital’s post-acute volume.

Top SNF Partners Pts Share FSHR Risk
Asbury Health Center204.2%Elevated
Bethel Park Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation Center204.2%45.8%High
Vincentian Home194.0%12.1%Elevated
East End Health & Rehab Center, Llc173.6%Elevated
Whitehall Borough Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation Center163.4%33.3%High
UPMC Lititz
Lititz, PA  ·  55 Beds  ·  Opportunity Score: 23
Monitor
111
FFS SNF Patients
30
SNF Destinations
25.2%
FSHR (-6.3pp vs system)
31.4%
System FSHR Avg

UPMC Lititz discharged 111 FFS patients to 30 distinct SNF destinations over the analysis period. FSHR stands at 25.2%, -6.3pp vs system average. The leading post-acute destination is Luther Acres Manor (29 patients, 18.0% share). The hospital’s SNF network includes 2 facilityies with a “Very High” risk category.

The Lititz post-acute network illustrates the broader UPMC pattern: a small number of high-volume SNF relationships account for the top discharge share, while the remaining volume is distributed across a long tail of facilities that operate without systematic performance oversight. A preferred-network framework anchored at Lititz’s highest-volume destinations — with embedded clinical presence at the most critical facilities — would immediately extend coordinated care management across the majority of this hospital’s post-acute volume.

Top SNF Partners Pts Share FSHR Risk
Luther Acres Manor2918.0%29.0%High
Rehabilitation Center At Brethren Village Llc2515.5%29.3%Elevated
United Zion Retirement Community2113.0%22.6%Elevated
Hamilton Arms Center Opco Llc138.1%Elevated
Landis Homes Retirement Community127.5%11.8%High
UPMC Wellsboro
Wellsboro, PA  ·  25 Beds  ·  Opportunity Score: 30
Monitor
72
FFS SNF Patients
10
SNF Destinations
44.0%
FSHR (+12.6pp vs system)
31.4%
System FSHR Avg

UPMC Wellsboro discharged 72 FFS patients to 10 distinct SNF destinations over the analysis period. FSHR stands at 44.0%, +12.6pp vs system average. The leading post-acute destination is Broad Acres Health & Rehabilitation Center (42 patients, 5.4% share).

The Wellsboro post-acute network illustrates the broader UPMC pattern: a small number of high-volume SNF relationships account for the top discharge share, while the remaining volume is distributed across a long tail of facilities that operate without systematic performance oversight. A preferred-network framework anchored at Wellsboro’s highest-volume destinations — with embedded clinical presence at the most critical facilities — would immediately extend coordinated care management across the majority of this hospital’s post-acute volume.

Top SNF Partners Pts Share FSHR Risk
Broad Acres Health & Rehabilitation Center425.4%50.0%Moderate
The Green Home305.0%35.7%Moderate
15900 Us 6 Opco LlcModerate
Charles Cole Memorial HospitalModerate
Darway Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterModerate
UPMC Somerset
Somerset, PA  ·  99 Beds  ·  Opportunity Score: 31
Monitor
51
FFS SNF Patients
21
SNF Destinations
30.5%
FSHR (-1.0pp vs system)
31.4%
System FSHR Avg

UPMC Somerset discharged 51 FFS patients to 21 distinct SNF destinations over the analysis period. FSHR stands at 30.5%, -1.0pp vs system average. The leading post-acute destination is Patriot Village (27 patients, 5.5% share).

The Somerset post-acute network illustrates the broader UPMC pattern: a small number of high-volume SNF relationships account for the top discharge share, while the remaining volume is distributed across a long tail of facilities that operate without systematic performance oversight. A preferred-network framework anchored at Somerset’s highest-volume destinations — with embedded clinical presence at the most critical facilities — would immediately extend coordinated care management across the majority of this hospital’s post-acute volume.

Top SNF Partners Pts Share FSHR Risk
Patriot Village275.5%32.1%Moderate
Meadow View Nursing Center245.8%28.6%Moderate
Arbutus Park ManorModerate
Beacon RidgeModerate
Bethlen Home Of The Hungarian Reformed Federation Of AmericaModerate
UPMC Bedford
Everett, PA  ·  40 Beds  ·  Opportunity Score: 29
Monitor
44
FFS SNF Patients
11
SNF Destinations
29.6%
FSHR (-1.8pp vs system)
31.4%
System FSHR Avg

UPMC Bedford discharged 44 FFS patients to 11 distinct SNF destinations over the analysis period. FSHR stands at 29.6%, -1.8pp vs system average. The leading post-acute destination is Bedford Skilling Nursing And Rehabilitation Center (18 patients, 4.5% share).

The Bedford post-acute network illustrates the broader UPMC pattern: a small number of high-volume SNF relationships account for the top discharge share, while the remaining volume is distributed across a long tail of facilities that operate without systematic performance oversight. A preferred-network framework anchored at Bedford’s highest-volume destinations — with embedded clinical presence at the most critical facilities — would immediately extend coordinated care management across the majority of this hospital’s post-acute volume.

Top SNF Partners Pts Share FSHR Risk
Bedford Skilling Nursing And Rehabilitation Center184.5%35.3%Moderate
Homewood Living Martinsburg, Inc.144.9%27.5%Moderate
Pennknoll Village124.5%23.5%Moderate
Chambersburg Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterModerate
Gettysburg CenterModerate
UPMC Magee-Womens Hospital
Pittsburgh, PA  ·  335 Beds  ·  Opportunity Score: 30
Monitor
30
FFS SNF Patients
25
SNF Destinations
30.3%
FSHR (-1.1pp vs system)
31.4%
System FSHR Avg

UPMC Magee-Womens Hospital discharged 30 FFS patients to 25 distinct SNF destinations over the analysis period. FSHR stands at 30.3%, -1.1pp vs system average. The leading post-acute destination is Upmc Magee-Womens Hospital (30 patients, 31.3% share). The hospital’s SNF network includes 11 facilityies with a “Very High” risk category.

The Magee-Womens post-acute network illustrates the broader UPMC pattern: a small number of high-volume SNF relationships account for the top discharge share, while the remaining volume is distributed across a long tail of facilities that operate without systematic performance oversight. A preferred-network framework anchored at Magee-Womens’s highest-volume destinations — with embedded clinical presence at the most critical facilities — would immediately extend coordinated care management across the majority of this hospital’s post-acute volume.

Top SNF Partners Pts Share FSHR Risk
Upmc Magee-Womens Hospital3031.3%30.3%Elevated
Bethel Park Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterHigh
Bethlen Home Of The Hungarian Reformed Federation Of AmericaHigh
Brightwood CenterElevated
Caring Heights Community Care And Rehabilitation CenterHigh
UPMC McKeesport
McKeesport, PA  ·  213 Beds  ·  Opportunity Score: 28
Monitor
28
FFS SNF Patients
25
SNF Destinations
31.9%
FSHR (+0.4pp vs system)
31.4%
System FSHR Avg

UPMC McKeesport discharged 28 FFS patients to 25 distinct SNF destinations over the analysis period. FSHR stands at 31.9%, +0.4pp vs system average. The leading post-acute destination is Riverside Health & Rehab Center, Llc (28 patients, 32.2% share). The hospital’s SNF network includes 7 facilityies with a “Very High” risk category.

The McKeesport post-acute network illustrates the broader UPMC pattern: a small number of high-volume SNF relationships account for the top discharge share, while the remaining volume is distributed across a long tail of facilities that operate without systematic performance oversight. A preferred-network framework anchored at McKeesport’s highest-volume destinations — with embedded clinical presence at the most critical facilities — would immediately extend coordinated care management across the majority of this hospital’s post-acute volume.

Top SNF Partners Pts Share FSHR Risk
Riverside Health & Rehab Center, Llc2832.2%31.9%Elevated
Baldwin Health CenterHigh
Bethel Park Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterElevated
Concordia At Rebecca ResidenceModerate
Concordia At The CedarsHigh
UPMC Kane
Kane, PA  ·  31 Beds  ·  Opportunity Score: 20
Monitor
22
FFS SNF Patients
11
SNF Destinations
66.7%
FSHR (+35.2pp vs system)
31.4%
System FSHR Avg

UPMC Kane discharged 22 FFS patients to 11 distinct SNF destinations over the analysis period. FSHR stands at 66.7%, +35.2pp vs system average. The leading post-acute destination is Lutheran Home At Kane Pennsylvania (22 patients, 4.8% share).

The Kane post-acute network illustrates the broader UPMC pattern: a small number of high-volume SNF relationships account for the top discharge share, while the remaining volume is distributed across a long tail of facilities that operate without systematic performance oversight. A preferred-network framework anchored at Kane’s highest-volume destinations — with embedded clinical presence at the most critical facilities — would immediately extend coordinated care management across the majority of this hospital’s post-acute volume.

Top SNF Partners Pts Share FSHR Risk
Lutheran Home At Kane Pennsylvania224.8%66.7%Moderate
Bradford Ecumenical Home IncModerate
Bradford ManorModerate
Guy And Mary Felt Manor, Inc.Moderate
Kadima Rehabilitation & Nursing At New CastleModerate
Benchmark Note: Pennsylvania state SNF utilization and 30-day readmission benchmarks not available in current data extract. System FSHR avg 31.4% used as internal reference. 30-day readmission rates are computed from weighted SNF-level data, FFS Q4 2024 – Q3 2025. Risk scores derived from facility risk category: Very Low=1.0, Low=2.0, Medium=3.0, High=4.0, Very High=5.0.

129 SNFs Already Serve Multiple UPMC Hospitals — Without Coordination

Of the 375 SNF destinations across the UPMC network, 129 already serve two or more UPMC hospitals simultaneously. These shared facilities are the structural backbone of any preferred-network strategy — existing relationships that can be elevated and formalized without requiring new partnerships to be built from scratch.

Top 12 of 129 Cross-System SNFs — Serving Multiple UPMC Hospitals (FSHR shown)
SNF Name
FSHR
Hospitals Served
Harmony Physical Rehabilitation
21.5%
6 hospitals  ·  70 pts · Presbyterian Shadyside, East, St. Margaret, Mercy +2
East End Health & Rehab Center, Llc
25.6%
6 hospitals  ·  59 pts · Presbyterian Shadyside, Passavant–McCandless, East, St. Margaret +2
Concordia At The Cedars
34.9%
6 hospitals  ·  51 pts · Presbyterian Shadyside, East, St. Margaret, Mercy +2
Vincentian Home
31.4%
5 hospitals  ·  142 pts · Presbyterian Shadyside, Passavant–McCandless, St. Margaret, Mercy +1
Concordia At Rebecca Residence
31.6%
5 hospitals  ·  115 pts · Presbyterian Shadyside, Passavant–McCandless, St. Margaret, Mercy +1
Upmc Magee-Womens Hospital
36.6%
5 hospitals  ·  59 pts · Presbyterian Shadyside, St. Margaret, Mercy, Magee-Womens Hospital +1
Concordia Lutheran Ministries Of Pittsburgh
26.9%
5 hospitals  ·  38 pts · Presbyterian Shadyside, Passavant–McCandless, Washington, Mercy +1
The Willows Of Presbyterian Medical Center
21.5%
4 hospitals  ·  79 pts · Presbyterian Shadyside, East, St. Margaret, Mercy
Jamc Opco Llc
50.7%
4 hospitals  ·  77 pts · Presbyterian Shadyside, Passavant–McCandless, Jameson, Horizon
Seneca Place
4 hospitals  ·  47 pts · Presbyterian Shadyside, East, St. Margaret, Magee-Womens Hospital
Penn-Allegheny Nursing And Rehabilitation Center Llc
35.6%
4 hospitals  ·  37 pts · Presbyterian Shadyside, East, Magee-Womens Hospital, McKeesport
Transitions Healthcare North Huntingdon
4 hospitals  ·  30 pts · Presbyterian Shadyside, East, Magee-Womens Hospital, McKeesport

Harmony Physical Rehabilitation is among the most connected SNFs in the UPMC network — serving 6 hospitals with 70 total patients. Concordia at Rebecca Residence, Heritage Park Rehab, and the other high-volume cross-system facilities represent the tier of shared relationships where a coordinated embedded clinical presence delivers immediate and demonstrable impact across multiple UPMC hospitals simultaneously.

Of particular note are cross-system facilities with elevated FSHR: facilities that already appear in multiple UPMC hospital discharge patterns with FSHR above the system average are precisely where an embedded clinical presence and preferred-network performance standards create the accountability to drive measurable FSHR improvement.

The 129 cross-system facilities represent the natural starting cohort for a coordinated UPMC preferred network. A structured engagement beginning with these shared partners would immediately extend coverage across the broadest reach of UPMC hospitals and create the governance layer for performance tracking across the most consequential downstream relationships in the system.


15 High-Impact SNF Facilities for Immediate Engagement

The priority target analysis identifies SNFs with elevated FSHR rates, meaningful patient volume, and cross-hospital presence. These facilities represent the intersection of high clinical risk and strategic leverage: where an embedded Puzzle clinical presence would deliver immediate impact across multiple UPMC hospitals simultaneously.

Priority SNF Targets — Ranked by Priority Score (FSHR shown)
SNF Name
FSHR
Volume · Hospitals
1. Spring Creek Rehabilitation And Nursing Center
48.5%
117 pts · 3 hosps · Pinnacle Harrisburg, Carlisle, Memorial
2. Jamc Opco Llc
50.7%
77 pts · 4 hosps · Presbyterian Shadyside, Passavant – McCandless, Jameson +1
3. Lutheran Home At Kane Pennsylvania
66.7%
34 pts · 3 hosps · Hamot, Chautauqua, Kane
4. Hanover Hall For Nursing And Rehabilitation
52.1%
52 pts · 2 hosps · Hanover, Memorial
5. Midtown Oaks Health & Rehab Center, Llc
68.2%
29 pts · 1 hosps · Altoona
6. Presbyterian Home Of Hollidaysburg
52.9%
45 pts · 2 hosps · Altoona, Bedford
7. Heritage Park Rehab & Skilled Nursing
39.1%
107 pts · 2 hosps · Hamot, Chautauqua
8. North Hills Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation Center
60.0%
28 pts · 2 hosps · Passavant – McCandless, St. Margaret
9. Erie Snf Operations Llc
47.4%
49 pts · 2 hosps · Hamot, Chautauqua
10. Broad Acres Health & Rehabilitation Center
50.0%
42 pts · 2 hosps · Williamsport, Wellsboro
11. Valley View Health And Rehabilitation Center
43.8%
57 pts · 2 hosps · Altoona, Bedford
12. Washington Operating Llc
50.6%
36 pts · 1 hosps · Washington
13. Golden Hill Nursing And Rehab Lp
61.0%
23 pts · 1 hosps · Jameson
14. Capital Health & Rehab Center, Llc
51.4%
32 pts · 1 hosps · Pinnacle Harrisburg
15. Edison Manor Nursing And Rehabilitation
63.0%
20 pts · 1 hosps · Jameson

Spring Creek Rehabilitation And Nursing Center leads the priority target list with a priority score of 19.9 — an FSHR of 48.5% across 3 UPMC hospitals and 117 patients. This facility, and others like Jamc Opco LLC, Lutheran Home At Kane, and Hanover Hall for Nursing and Rehabilitation, represent precisely the kind of high-volume, high-FSHR, multi-hospital relationships where an embedded Puzzle clinical presence delivers immediate and measurable return.

Together, the 15 priority targets cover relationships across most of UPMC’s active hospital portfolio. A coordinated engagement beginning with these facilities would immediately extend Puzzle’s embedded presence into the highest-risk corner of UPMC’s post-acute network — without requiring a facility-by-facility cold-call campaign. UPMC’s endorsement opens those doors, and Puzzle’s embedded clinical model provides the sustained presence to drive performance improvement over time.


Where to Focus First

Every active UPMC hospital is scored on a composite of discharge volume, destination breadth, FSHR elevation, and destination-level facility risk. The index surfaces relative priority — not a critique of any individual hospital’s care quality, but a guide to where systematic post-acute infrastructure delivers the greatest immediate return. Pennsylvania state SNF utilization benchmark not available; utilization component defaults to a neutral score of 8 for all hospitals.

All UPMC Hospitals — Ranked by Opportunity Score
Hospital Beds SNF Pts Dests FSHR % Score Priority
UPMC Western Maryland2137202513.3%53Near-Term
UPMC Chautauqua1992012527.4%46Near-Term
UPMC Pinnacle (Harrisburg / Community Osteopathic / West Shore)7045873036.2%38Near-Term
UPMC Jameson1333023054.3%36Near-Term
UPMC Passavant – McCandless3943572533.1%34Monitor
UPMC Northwest1712923038.0%34Monitor
UPMC Altoona3802833042.6%33Monitor
UPMC Hamot4124623036.1%32Monitor
UPMC Carlisle1653023032.3%32Monitor
UPMC Washington2442923033.3%31Monitor
UPMC Somerset99512130.5%31Monitor
UPMC Hanover932853033.0%30Monitor
UPMC Wellsboro25721044.0%30Monitor
UPMC Magee-Womens Hospital335302530.3%30Monitor
UPMC Presbyterian Shadyside (incl. Montefiore)14204312132.9%29Monitor
UPMC St. Margaret2501582527.5%29Monitor
UPMC Bedford40441129.6%29Monitor
UPMC Horizon (Greenville / Shenango Valley)2282033026.5%28Monitor
UPMC McKeesport213282531.9%28Monitor
UPMC East1561632535.1%27Monitor
UPMC Memorial981523027.5%27Monitor
UPMC Williamsport2242532533.0%23Monitor
UPMC Lititz551113025.2%23Monitor
UPMC Mercy4041212530.9%22Monitor
UPMC Kane31221166.7%20Monitor
UPMC Passavant – Cranberry35No Data
UPMC Greene23No Data
UPMC Muncy158No Data
Opportunity Score: composite 0–100 (Volume 25 pts · Utilization vs. state 20 pts [neutral 8 — PA benchmark N/A] · FSHR elevation 40 pts · Destination fragmentation 15 pts). Hospitals with no CMS Medicare FFS Claims data score —.

UPMC Western Maryland leads the opportunity ranking with a score of 53 — driven primarily by its dominant patient volume and the breadth of its SNF destination network. This is a scale-of-opportunity story: a high-volume hospital with a large, largely unmanaged SNF network is precisely where a preferred-network infrastructure delivers maximum return.

UPMC Chautauqua (46 score, Near-Term) and other Near-Term hospitals represent the tier where FSHR elevation merits structured attention. Their geographic proximity to high-volume UPMC markets means that a preferred-network framework anchored at the top hospitals naturally extends coverage to the Near-Term tier as well.


The OSF HealthCare Analogy: Introductions That Build a Network

Puzzle Healthcare’s engagement model is built around one core insight: the most effective way to improve post-acute outcomes at a health system is to establish an embedded presence inside the SNF network itself. That requires the health system’s endorsement to open the door. When OSF HealthCare did exactly that, it changed the economics of the entire engagement.

The OSF Precedent: When OSF HealthCare partnered with Puzzle Healthcare, the system introduced Puzzle to approximately 60 nursing homes across their post-acute network. That single act of introduction — OSF telling its downstream SNF partners that Puzzle had the health system’s trust and support — opened relationships that would have taken years to build through conventional vendor outreach. The embedded clinical presence that followed enabled real-time visibility, coordinated care management, and measurable FSHR improvement across all 60 facilities simultaneously.

UPMC Health has 375 unique SNF destinations — a network of significantly greater scale than what OSF brought to that engagement. UPMC’s 129 cross-system shared facilities represent the natural introductions cohort: SNFs that already know and trust multiple UPMC hospitals, and where a coordinated Puzzle presence would have an immediate and demonstrable impact. That is 129 introductions — many times the minimum needed to make the engagement economics work — before Puzzle has made a single cold call.

01
Preferred Network Design
Jointly identify the SNF partners — starting with the 129 cross-system facilities and 15 priority targets — that meet quality thresholds and are willing to formalize a partnership with UPMC. Puzzle manages the relationship, tracks performance, and provides regular scorecards to UPMC care management and population health teams across all three states.
02
Embedded Clinical Presence
Puzzle places nurse practitioners and care managers inside preferred SNFs — not as outside consultants, but as embedded partners who round on UPMC patients, flag early deterioration, and communicate directly with hospital care teams. This is the mechanism that drives FSHR improvement without requiring the SNF to restructure its own staffing model.
03
Real-Time Visibility Dashboard
UPMC care management teams gain a unified view of post-acute performance across all 25 hospitals — FSHR rates by facility, length-of-stay trends, and destination-level risk scores — updated continuously. National CMS benchmarks are embedded as the reference standard throughout, with Pennsylvania, New York, and Maryland state-level benchmarks added as they become available.
04
Systematic Outcome Improvement
The combination of preferred-network accountability, embedded presence, and real-time visibility drives measurable improvement in FSHR and average SNF length of stay. These outcomes are reportable to payers, CMS, and UPMC leadership — and they compound over time as the preferred network matures across Pennsylvania, New York, and Maryland.

The engagement economics of Puzzle’s model require a minimum scale to be operationally viable: an embedded presence in a facility that receives only 8–10 patients per year cannot be sustained. UPMC’s cross-system SNF concentration solves this elegantly at scale. The top cross-system facilities — Vincentian Home, Concordia at Rebecca Residence, Heritage Park Rehab — collectively receive enough volume across multiple UPMC hospitals to support a full embedded clinical program from day one.

The explicit ask mirrors the OSF model: UPMC introduces Puzzle to its downstream SNF partners — particularly the 129 cross-system facilities where the relationship already exists — so that Puzzle can establish a coordinated presence across the network. With OSF, 60 such introductions built the foundation for a system-wide preferred network. UPMC’s 129 cross-system facilities represent a comparable starting point, with a clear path to expanding across the full 375-destination network as the preferred-network framework matures.


From Analysis to Action

The following sequence is designed to move efficiently from this initial analysis to a working preferred-network engagement, with no disruption to existing care pathways during the design phase.

1
Discovery Conversation — UPMC Leadership & Puzzle Healthcare
A structured 60-minute session to walk through this analysis together, validate the data findings against UPMC’s ground-level experience, and identify which hospitals and SNF relationships are highest operational priority for UPMC care management teams. Puzzle brings familiarity with the Pennsylvania, New York, and Maryland SNF markets and a clear view of the preferred-network design options that make sense at UPMC’s scale.
2
High-Volume Hospital Anchor Deep-Dives
Dedicated working sessions with UPMC Western Maryland, UPMC Pinnacle, and UPMC Hamot discharge planning, case management, and population health stakeholders to validate the top-SNF data, surface any preferred-partner relationships already in place, and establish the baseline performance metrics for a preferred-network framework. These three hospitals account for a large share of UPMC’s total post-acute volume and set the architecture for the broader system strategy.
3
Cross-System SNF Preferred Network Design
Using the 129 cross-system facilities and 15 priority targets as the foundation, Puzzle and UPMC co-design the preferred network. Selection criteria include current quality performance, geographic coverage, patient volume, and willingness to participate. Puzzle leads the SNF outreach and relationship management; UPMC provides the health-system endorsement that makes participation in the preferred network valuable to SNF operators across Pennsylvania, New York, and Maryland.
4
Formal Introduction to the UPMC SNF Network
UPMC formally introduces Puzzle to the preferred-network SNF facilities — mirroring the OSF model where the health system’s endorsement opens doors that a vendor cold-call cannot. The cross-system facilities and priority targets are the natural first cohort, with the broader 375-destination network as the longer-term expansion target. Puzzle negotiates participation agreements, establishes embedded clinical presence schedules, and onboards each facility. Target: initial cohort live within 90 days of network finalization.
5
Quarterly Performance Reviews
Standing quarterly reviews with UPMC care management and population health leadership to present FSHR trends by facility and hospital, FSHR benchmarking against national CMS standards and internal UPMC averages, facility-level performance scorecards, and network expansion recommendations. These sessions serve as the governance layer that keeps the preferred network accountable over time — and provide UPMC leadership with the data to demonstrate post-acute program impact to payers and internal stakeholders across all three states.

What UPMC Health Has — and What Comes Next

UPMC Health has built one of the most geographically expansive, organizationally integrated health systems in the country, spanning Pennsylvania, New York, and Maryland. 5,922 FFS patients, 375 SNF destinations, 25 active hospitals, and 129 facilities already embedded in multiple UPMC care pathways simultaneously. That is not a system with a post-acute crisis. It is a system with a post-acute opportunity of extraordinary scale that has not yet been systematically activated.

UPMC’s 25-hospital post-acute network currently operates as 25 largely independent discharge patterns, each sending patients to their own set of SNF destinations without shared performance standards, systematic accountability, or a unified visibility layer connecting UPMC care teams to downstream SNF performance. The 15 priority SNF targets — facilities with FSHR rates significantly above the system average appearing across multiple UPMC hospitals — represent the highest-urgency intervention points. But they are part of a larger structural story: 375 SNF destinations, most operating beyond the horizon of UPMC’s systematic oversight.

The 129 cross-system SNFs — facilities that already serve multiple UPMC hospitals and have demonstrated their relevance to the system’s post-acute continuum — are the proof of concept. Vincentian Home serves five UPMC hospitals. Concordia at Rebecca Residence serves five. These are not hypothetical preferred partners; they are already functioning as the de facto preferred network across Pittsburgh, Central Pennsylvania, and the UPMC system footprint. Puzzle’s role is to formalize it, extend it, and make it systematically measurable.

The explicit ask: Introduce Puzzle to UPMC’s downstream SNF partners — beginning with the 129 cross-system facilities and 15 priority targets that already serve multiple hospitals — so that Puzzle can establish a coordinated embedded presence across the network. When OSF HealthCare made that introduction across approximately 60 nursing homes, the result was a system-wide preferred-network program built on existing trust. UPMC has the same structural foundation — at a scale that makes the opportunity commensurately larger.

We look forward to the conversation — and to what UPMC Health’s post-acute program looks like with the visibility and coordination infrastructure to match the system’s clinical ambition across Pennsylvania, New York, and Maryland.